SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Chakraborty M, Gates TJ. Transp. Res. Rec. 2024; 2678(7): 642-655.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/03611981231208901

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Single-vehicle crashes are overrepresented on rural two-lane highway curves. While prior work investigated the relationship between crash occurrence and aggregate curve characteristics, several important aspects related to curve geometry remain uninvestigated. To this end, research was undertaken to evaluate the safety effects associated with several specific horizontal curve-related geometric characteristics (including curve type, curve direction, tangent distance between curves, and curve design speed) on rural two-lane undivided highways, considering non-animal single-vehicle crashes. Eight years of crash data were obtained for 277 mi and 557 mi of curved state and county highway segments, respectively, within Michigan. Several mixed-effects negative binomial models, with county- and site-specific random intercepts, were developed separately for state and county highways. The model results indicated that several key geometric factors were associated with crash occurrence on rural two-lane highways, including curve type, curve direction, tangent distance approaching the curve, inner-curve tangent distance, and curve design speed. Each of the following geometric characteristics was associated with elevated single-vehicle crash occurrence: (1) compound and reverse curves (compared with simple curves); (2) left-turning curves (compared with right-turning); (3) curves with design speeds lower than the speed limit (compared with curves with higher design speeds); (4) longer tangent distances approaching a simple curve or the initial curve in a series; and (5) shorter inner-curve distances between successive compound or reverse curves. Compound or reverse curves should be avoided in favor of simple curves with an elongated inner-curve distance. Enhanced warning signage should be considered where such curve designs cannot be avoided.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print