SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

García-de-Villa S, Ruiz LR, Neira GGV, Álvarez MN, Huertas-Hoyas E, Del-Ama AJ, Rodriguez-Sanchez MC, Seco F, Jiménez AR. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2024; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)

DOI

10.1109/JBHI.2024.3434973

PMID

39074006

Abstract

Falls are a severe problem in older adults, often resulting in severe consequences such as injuries or loss of consciousness. It is crucial to screen fall risk in order to prescribe appropriate therapies that can potentially prevent falls. Identifying individuals who have experienced falls in the past, commonly known as fallers, is used to evaluate fall risk, as a prior fall indicates a higher likelihood of future falls. The methods that have the most support from evidence are Gait Speed (GS) and Time Up and Go (TUG), which use specific cut-off values to evaluate the fall risk. There have been proposals for alternative methods that use wearable sensor technology to improve fall risk assessment. Although these technological alternatives are promising, further research is necessary to validate their use in clinical settings. In this study, we propose a method for identifying fallers based on a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. The inputs for the classifier are the gait parameters obtained from a 30-minute walk recorded using an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) placed at the foot of patients. We validated our proposed method using a sample of 157 patients aged over 70 years. Our findings indicate significant differences (p< 0.05) in stride speed, clearance, angular velocity, acceleration, and coefficient of variability among steps between fallers and non-fallers. The proposed method demonstrates the its potential to classify fallers with an accuracy of [79.6]%, slightly outperforming the GS method which provides an accuracy of [77.0]%, and also overcomes its dependency on the cut-off speed to determine fallers. This method could be valuable in detecting fallers during long-term monitoring that does not require periodic evaluations in a clinical setting.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print