SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hagemeister DT, Oosthuizen W, Mokae B. S. Afr. Fam. Pract. (2004) 2024; 66(1): e1-e5.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.4102/safp.v66i1.5919

PMID

38949454

Abstract

Medical confidentiality is the cornerstone for a trustful relationship between patients and the health professionals attending to them. However, when history or clinical findings suggest certain offenses, statutory laws (Children's Act, Older Persons Act, Mental Health Care Act, Sexual Offenses Act) establish a legal obligation for health professionals to report suspected instances of abuse to the police or alternatively, in some cases, to a designated social worker. Given the high rate of domestic violence and abuse in South Africa, health professionals are most likely to encounter such situations. Many clinicians are oblivious of the obligations, exposing themselves to possible liability and their patients to potential additional harm. This article aims to demonstrate the reporting requirements under the respective acts through case scenarios. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of the existing legal setting are discussed briefly.


Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Female; Male; South Africa; abuse; *Mandatory Reporting; *Police/legislation & jurisprudence; Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence; delivery of healthcare; Domestic Violence/legislation & jurisprudence; mandatory reporting; Social Work/legislation & jurisprudence; vulnerable populations

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print