Citation

Bell DSA. Br. J. Sociol. 2003; 54(1): 63-81.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, London School of Economics and Political Science, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1080/0007131032000045905

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In this paper I seek to challenge the dominant modes of conceiving the relationship between memory and national identity, and in so doing offer analysts of nationalism an improved understanding of the dynamics of national identity formation. The concept of collective memory is invoked regularly in attempts to explain the pervasiveness and power of nationalism. I argue that the concept is misused routinely in this context, and instead I employ a ?social agency? approach to theorizing, whereby memory is conceived in a more limited and cogent manner. I argue that it is important to distinguish clearly between memory and mythology, both of which are essential to understanding national identity, for not only are the two concepts distinct, they can also act in opposition to each other. Following from this I introduce the notion of a ?mythscape?, the temporally and spatially extended discursive realm in which the myths of the nation are forged, transmitted, negotiated, and reconstructed constantly. Through employing the idea of a mythscape we can relate memory and mythology to each other in a theoretically profitable way.

Keywords

history; Memory; mythology; mythscape; national identity; nationalism