Citation

Bhambra GK. Br. J. Sociol. 2021; 72(1): 69-78.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, London School of Economics and Political Science, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/1468-4446.12804

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Piketty?s call for a historically informed, global analysis of inequality is timely, as is the need for a corresponding transformation of our current politics. However, I believe there to be a fundamental flaw in his analysis which reproduces a Eurocentric approach to understanding global inequality. The key issue is that Piketty organizes his historical comparative analysis in terms of inequality within nations. Yet, the polities he is discussing were rarely just nations over the long durée. Rather, they were imperial formations constituted by a colonizing state and the territories and populations that were incorporated. His approach separates the logic of what he calls the modern proprietarian regime of inequality from enslavement and colonialism when both were integral to it. In contrast, I argue for them to be seen as necessarily interconnected with a lasting legacy in contemporary configurations of global inequality.

Keywords

colonialism; connected histories; empire; inequality