Citation

Peretti-Watel P. Br. J. Sociol. 2003; 54(1): 21-42.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, London School of Economics and Political Science, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1080/0007131032000045888

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In contemporary societies, risk culture and risk profiling lead to the stigmatization of unhealthy behaviours as ?risky?. Risk denial theory refers to a cognitive way to deal with risky behaviours and can be considered as an updated variant of Sykes and Matza's neutralization theory. People neutralize the ?risky? label using specific techniques that must be added to those previously enlisted by Sykes and Matza. This paper introduces and discusses three techniques of risk denial: scapegoating, self-confidence and comparison between risks. As it is usually defined and studied as a ?risky behaviour?, cannabis use provides a relevant example to illustrate these types of risk denial, thanks to various ethnographic studies (including Becker's seminal work on marijuana smokers) and quantitative French data from the 1999 European School Survey on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD). In order to deny the ?risky? label, cannabis users scapegoat ?hard drugs? users, they emphasize their own ability to control their consumption personally, or they compare cannabis and alcohol risks. The paper concludes with suggestions for further analyses of risk denial.

Keywords

adolescence; cannabis use; Risk denial; risky behaviours; techniques of neutralization