SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Pixley J. Br. J. Sociol. 2002; 53(1): 41-65.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, London School of Economics and Political Science, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1080/00071310120109320

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Analyses of global financial markets are dominated by atomized models of decision-making and behavioural psychology (?exuberance? or ?panic?). In contrast, this paper argues that overwhelmingly, finance organizations rather than ?individuals? make decisions, and routinely use emotions in formulating expectations. Keynes introduced emotion (business confidence and animal spirits) but in economics, emotion remains individualistic and irrational. Luhmann's system theory lies at the other extreme, where emotions like trust and confidence are central variables, functional in the reduction of complexity in sub-systems like the economy. The gap between irrational emotions aggregated to ?herd? behaviour in economics, and ?system trust? applied to finance and money as a ?medium of communication? in sociology, remains largely unfilled. This paper argues that while organizations cannot be said to ?think? or ?feel?, they are rational and emotional, because impersonal trust, confidence and their contrary emotions are unavoidable in decision-making due to fundamental uncertainty. These future-oriented emotions are prevalent within and between organizations in the financial sector, primarily in generating expectations. The dynamic of corporate activities of tense and ruthless struggle is a more plausible level of analysis than either financial ?manias? in aggregate or ?system trust?.

Keywords

confidence; expectations; Finance organizations; impersonal trust; uncertainty

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print