SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Mondragón Barrios L, Guarneros García T, Jiménez Tapia A. J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics 2017; 12(3): 161-168.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, University of California Press)

DOI

10.1177/1556264617708937

PMID

28535710

Abstract

The objective of this article is to compare various ethical issues considered by social scientists and research ethics committees in the evaluation of mental health social research protocols. We contacted 47 social scientists and 10 members of ethics committees in Mexico with two electronic national surveys that requested information from both groups related to the application of ethical principles in mental health social research. The results showed no significant difference between these groups in the value placed on the ethical issues explored. Based on this finding, we make proposals to strengthen the collaboration between the two groups.


Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Research; Female; Male; mental health; Suicide; Violence; Mental Health; Surveys and Questionnaires; Attitude; Behavior, Addictive; Research Personnel; Ethics, Research; Ethics Committees, Research; Ethical Review; Social Sciences; ethical evaluation; RECs; social research; social scientists

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print