SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bryan CJ, Allen MH, Thomsen CJ, May AM, Baker JC, Harris JA, Bryan ABO, Russell WA. Contemp. Clin. Trials 2019; 84: e105823.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.cct.2019.105823

PMID

31400514

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary care is the most frequently visited clinic type immediately prior to suicidal behavior, with nearly half of suicide decedents visiting a primary care provider within a month of their death. Data supporting the efficacy of suicide risk screening in this setting is lacking, however. Improved suicide risk screening in primary care could lead to earlier intervention and treatment.
PURPOSE: The PRImary care Screening Methods (PRISM) study is designed to develop and evaluate the efficacy of an alert algorithm that can be used by military primary care providers to accurately identify high-risk patients, to improve the identification of high-risk patients who deny suicidal thoughts, and to quantify patient subgroups who are more likely to be missed by existing screening methods (i.e., false negatives).
METHODS: The rationale of the PRISM study is discussed, along with ethical and design considerations related to the conduct of suicide prevention research. The PRISM study enrolled 2690 patients from six primary care clinics across the U.S. Patients were enrolled during routine visits to a primary care clinic, and completed a battery of self-report scales in clinic waiting rooms. Follow-up phone interviews are conducted 1, 6, and 12 months after enrollment. The primary outcome is suicide attempt.
CONCLUSIONS: PRISM is the first study to prospectively examine multiple suicide risk screening methods in "real-world" military primary care clinics. Ethical and design issues were considered to ensure that human participants, especially suicidal patients, were adequately protected while minimizing the potential confounding effect of risk management protocols.


Language: en

Keywords

Humans; United States; Risk management; Socioeconomic Factors; Health Status; Suicide; Prospective Studies; Age Factors; Sex Factors; Comorbidity; Primary care; Suicidal Ideation; Suicide, Attempted; Algorithms; Primary Health Care; Mass Screening; Screening; Military Personnel; Inservice Training; Risk Management; PRISM; Multicenter Studies as Topic

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print