SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Schlicker S, Weisel KK, Buntrock C, Berking M, Nobis S, Lehr D, Baumeister H, Snoek FJ, Riper H, Ebert DD. J. Diabetes Res. 2019; 2019: e2634094.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Hindawi Publishing)

DOI

10.1155/2019/2634094

PMID

31218230

PMCID

PMC6536948

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 are linked to higher prevalence and occurrences of depression. Internet-based depression- and diabetes-specific cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) can be effective in reducing depressive symptom severity and diabetes-related emotional distress. The aim of the study was to test whether disease-specific severity indicators moderate the treatment outcome in a 6-week minimally guided web-based self-help intervention on depression and diabetes (GET.ON Mood Enhancer Diabetes (GET.ON M.E.D.)) and to determine its effectiveness in a nonsuicidal severely depressed subgroup.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trial- (RCT-) based data (N = 253) comparing GET.ON M.E.D. to an online psychoeducation control group was used to test disease-specific severity indicators as predictors/moderators of a treatment outcome. Changes in depressive symptom severity and treatment response were examined in a nonsuicidal severely depressed subgroup (CES - D > 40; N = 40).
RESULTS: Major depressive disorder diagnosis at the baseline (p prf6 = 0.01), higher levels of depression (Beck Depression Inventory II; p prpo = 0.00; p prf6 = 0.00), and lower HbA1c (p prpo = 0.04) predicted changes in depressive symptoms. No severity indicator moderated the treatment outcome. Severely depressed participants in the intervention group showed a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptom severity (d prpo = 2.17, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.39-2.96) than the control condition (d prpo = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.001-1.83), with a between-group effect size of d prpo = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.11-1.98). Treatment response was seen in significantly more participants in the intervention (4/20; 20%) compared to the control group (0/20, 0%; χ 2 (2)(N = 40) = 4.44; p < 0.02). At the 6-month follow-up, effects were maintained for depressive symptom reduction (d pr6f = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.19-1.61) but not treatment response.
CONCLUSION: Disease-specific severity indicators were not related to a differential effectiveness of guided self-help for depression and diabetes. Clinical meaningful effects were observed in nonsuicidal severely depressed individuals, who do not need to be excluded from web-based guided self-help. However, participants should be closely monitored and referred to other treatment modalities in case of nonresponse.


Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Adult; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Internet; Severity of Illness Index; Comorbidity; Treatment Outcome; Health Behavior; Suicidal Ideation; Surveys and Questionnaires; Affect; Psychotherapy; Self-Help Groups; Language; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Depressive Disorder, Major; Patient Education as Topic; Self Care; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Psychological Distress; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print