SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Podlogar MC, Joiner TE. Assessment 2020; 27(3): 547-559.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1073191119845495

PMID

31053035

Abstract

Inaccurate disclosure of information is a significant limitation when relying on self-report for suicide risk screening. However, allowing for an explicit nondisclosure response option in screening items (e.g., "prefer not to disclose") may ultimately improve follow-up assessment validity. This study investigated explicit nondisclosure in suicide risk screening among military service members and veterans (n = 135), men older than 50 years, (n = 187), and LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer) young adults (n = 140); all higher risk and lower help-seeking populations.

RESULTS indicated that allowing for explicit nondisclosure minimally affected screening sensitivity and specificity. However, its selection was prevalent among higher risk participants, and was associated with experience of past unhelpful reactions and "avoidance of stigmatized consequences." Allowing for nondisclosure creates potential psychometric and classification advantages, and may be a safe and effective way to encourage discussion of barriers, build trust, maximize patient autonomy, and ultimately facilitate accurate risk disclosure to improve assessment validity.


Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Female; Male; Suicide; Young Adult; Sexual Behavior; risk assessment; Veterans; Bisexuality; help seeking; mixed methods; Sexual and Gender Minorities; BSS; selective disclosure

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print