SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Vieta E, Calabrese JR, Hennen J, Colom F, Martínez-Arán A, Sánchez-Moreno J, Yatham LN, Tohen M, Baldessarini RJ. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2004; 65(10): 1420-1428.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Physicians Postgraduate Press)

DOI

10.4088/jcp.v65n1019

PMID

15491248

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rapid-cycling (RC) bipolar disorder patients experience high levels of morbidity, typically respond unsatisfactorily to available treatments, and, so, require additional studies of novel treatments. We report on the first controlled study comparing acute and continuous clinical outcomes in RC and non-RC manic patients treated with olanzapine.
METHOD: We analyzed data pooled from 2 placebo-controlled, double-blind, 3- to 4-week trials of olanzapine in mania (N = 254), 1 with an open-label extension up to 1 year (N = 113) and controlled supplementation with lithium or fluoxetine as needed, to compare demographic, clinical, and outcome measures between RC and non-RC subgroups of 254 DSM-IV bipolar I manic subjects.
RESULTS: RC (N = 90, 35%) versus non-RC subjects (N = 164, 65%) were younger at intake (p =.02), less often psychotic (p <.0001), and more likely to have familial bipolar disorder (p <.0001), abused substances (p =.01), more previous hospitalizations (p =.004), and many more illness episodes (p <.001). In initial blinded trial outcomes, relative responses (> or = 50% improvement of mania) to olanzapine/placebo were similar in RC and non-RC subjects, though early responses to olanzapine favored RC over non-RC subjects (p =.003), and long-term outcomes favored non-RC subjects (p =.05). Fewer RC subjects achieved strictly defined initial symptomatic remission (p =.014) within a year; RC subjects were more likely to experience recurrences (p =.002), especially of depressive illness (<.001), and had more rehospitalizations (p =.01) and suicide attempts (p =.03).
CONCLUSIONS: RC bipolar I patients showed major initial differences and more rapid initial clinical changes, especially toward depression, with less favorable long-term outcomes than non-RC cases during treatment with olanzapine. Inclusion of RC bipolar disorder patients can complicate therapeutic trials, but these patients require further study for differential responsiveness to innovative treatments with methods of assessing clinical response that take their mood instability into account.


Language: en

Keywords

Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluoxetine; Humans; Lithium; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Olanzapine; Proportional Hazards Models; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print