Citation

Pacík D, Dolezel J, Kumstát P. Rozhl. Chir. 1998; 77(11): 508-510.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1998, Nakladem Ceskoslovenske Chirurgicke Spolecnosti)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

9990239

Abstract

The authors implanted to a group of 10 patients incontinent after prostate surgery (on account of BPH and adenocarcinoma) an artificial AMS 800 sphincter. After a mean follow-up period of 29 months they evaluate based on a questionnaire the therapeutic effect and its influence on the patients quality of life as well as the adequacy of the approval procedure of indication on the part of the insurance company as it influences the quality of life. The effect of treatment and influence on quality of life is evaluated without exception very highly while the approval process is evaluated negatively. The authors draw attention to the risk of suicide in mentally otherwise sound subjects due to unsatisfactory solution of urinary incontinence. Correctly indicated treatment by an artificial sphincter can achieve very satisfactory results. The approval procedure must combine medical and rational aspects, it must be however revised, incl. the economic aspects of the system of health services.

Language: cs

Keywords

Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prostatectomy; Quality of Life; Urinary Incontinence; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial