Citation

Flick MR. Calif. Law Rev. 1991; 79(4): 1161-1167.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1991, School of Jurisprudence of the University of California)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11659478

Abstract

[Abstract unavailable]

Language: en

Keywords

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Bartling v. Superior Court; Bouvia v. Superior Court (Glenchur); Critical Illness; Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health; Death and Euthanasia; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Food; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Intensive Care Units; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legal Approach; Moral Obligations; Paternalism; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Social Responsibility; Suicide; Superintendent v. Saikewicz; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment