Citation

Lyon EA. Univ. Cincinnati Law Rev. 1990; 58(4): 1367-1395.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1990, Board of Editors)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11659504

Abstract

[Abstract unavailable]

Language: en

Keywords

Civil Rights; Cruzan v. Harmon; Death and Euthanasia; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Government Regulation; Humans; In re Quinlan; Informed Consent; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legal Approach; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Privacy; Professional Patient Relationship; Prognosis; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; Suicide; Superintendent v. Saikewicz; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment