Citation

Berman MB. Southwestern University Law Review 1992; 22(1): 105-158.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1992)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11656255

Abstract

[Abstract unavailable]

Language: en

Keywords

Abortion, Induced; Advance Directives; California; Civil Rights; Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health; Death and Euthanasia; Decision Making; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Humans; In re Quinlan; Jurisprudence; Legal Approach; Life Support Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Privacy; Public Opinion; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Religion; Right to Die; Suicide; Supreme Court Decisions; Terminally Ill; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment