Citation

Perry JM, Modesti C, Nicolais C, Talamo A, Nicolais G. J. Trauma. Stress 2022; 35(2): 362-374.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/jts.22745

PMID

34644437

Abstract

The end of the last decade saw record numbers of refugee arrivals to Italy, straining the existing reception and integration systems. Although significant research attention has focused on the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and suicidal ideation in refugee populations, there are increasing calls to study the interactions between distress, resilience, and positive outcomes of adversity. To fully understand the complexity of the refugee experience, these voices must be heard in dialogue. Studies must be framed within a more nuanced view of refugees, characterizing them not exclusively as victims but also as advocates for their own well-being and the well-being of their communities. This exploratory study performed a thematic analysis of 15 interviews conducted with refugee community leaders in Italy, each a founder or leader of a community association and actively engaged in civil society. In keeping with Papadopoulos' (2007) construct of adversity-activated development, an inductive analysis identified three distinct patterns of positive adversity response: meaning, motivation, and mobilization. A deductive analysis identified the most appropriate theories of resilience to describe the sample, which included resilience as a dynamic positive adaptation and resilience as resistance to change in moral codes and personal value systems. The resulting image of refugee community leaders in Italy is that of individuals who are exposed to adversity and experiences of suffering and distress but safeguard their core values while positively adapting to a new country.

Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Motivation; Prevalence; Suicidal Ideation; Refugees; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic