SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Tyrer P, Yang M, Tyrer H, Crawford M. Pers. Ment. Health 2021; 15(4): 261-272.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/pmh.1513

PMID

33998774

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Personality assessment may be helped by proxy measures.
AIMS: To examine the assessment of social functioning in relationship to personality disorder.
METHOD: Secondary analysis of data from three clinical studies, following deliberate self-harm (n = 460), cognitive behaviour therapy for health anxiety (n = 444) and a 30-year follow-up of 200 anxious/depressed patients. Social function and personality were assessed using the Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ) and the Personality Assessment Schedule, with its ICD-11 modification. A 5-item short version of the SFQ, the Short Social Functioning Questionnaire (SSFQ), was also developed. The SFQ score in the first two studies (area under curve [AUC] 0.64 and 0.65) partly predicted personality status; in the third study, this achieved close agreement (AUC SFQ 0.85 [95% CI 0.8-0.9]; AUC SSFQ 0.84 [95% CI 0.78-0.89]). In all studies, social function deteriorated linearly with increasing personality pathology. Cut-off points of 4 on the SSFQ and 7 on the SFQ had high sensitivity (SSFQ 82%-90%; SFQ 82%-83%) and acceptable specificity (SSFQ 66%-75%; SFQ 69%-75%) in identifying personality disorder in the third study.
CONCLUSIONS: Social functioning recorded in either a 5-item or 8-item self-rating is a useful proxy measure of personality disturbance and may be the core of disorder.


Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Personality; Anxiety Disorders; Personality Disorders; Social Adjustment; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print