SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Içer M, Gündüz E, Guloglu C, Erbatur S, Polat D, Özkan H, Bayrak T, Göger Ülgüt. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2023; 53(6): 1877-1885.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey)

DOI

10.55730/1300-0144.5758

PMID

38813498

PMCID

PMC10760597

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: In many studies, shock indices have proven to be good tools for predicting mortality. In the present study, burn shock index (BSI), percentage of total body surface area burned (TBSA%) multiplied by shock index; burn modified shock index (BMSI), TBSA% multiplied by modified shock index; burn age shock index (BASI), TBSA% multiplied by age shock index; burn rivers shock index (BrSI), TBSA% multiplied by rivers shock index; burn rivers shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale score (BrSIG) were examined in burn patients. We defined these burn shock indices for the first time. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of shock indices and burn shock indices in predicting mortality in burn patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study examines retrospectively of burn patients admitted to the emergency department of Dicle University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2022. The patients' vital signs were obtained at the time of presentation to the emergency department, and shock indices were calculated. The effectiveness of shock indices in predicting mortality was compared.

RESULTS: A total of 2445 patients were included in the study. Of the patients, 1793 were pediatric, and 652 were adults. BSI (AUC: 0.872, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.812-0.931, p < 0.001) had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value in predicting mortality in children. The optimal cut-off value for BSI in children was 21.79 and its was sensitivity 83.05%, specificity 79.64%, positive predictive value (PPV) 12.19%, negative predictive value (NPV) 99.28%. In adults, BASI had the highest value of AUC (AUC: 0.936, 95% CI: 0.887-0.984, p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value for BASI in adults was 62.5 and its sensitivity was 86.49%, specificity was 91.71%, PPV was 38.55%, and NPV was 99.12%.

CONCLUSION: Shock indices are easy to calculate and effective in predicting mortality in burn patients admitted to the emergency department. Among the shock indices in the study, BSI was the best in predicting mortality in children, and BASI was the best in adults.


Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Child; Adult; Child, Preschool; Infant; Aged; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Adolescent; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult; Glasgow Coma Scale; Predictive Value of Tests; Burn; *Burns/mortality; *Shock/mortality; BASI; burn age shock index; burn shock index; shock index

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print