SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Wang Y, Wang Y, Yu X, Jiang J, Jia Y, Ma Y, Qian M. Chin. Ment. Health J. 2018; (12): 227-232.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Hsueh Shu Chi Kan Chu Pan She)

DOI

10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2018.03.008

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ethical decision-making process of breaking confidentiality when counselors dealing with self-inflicted injury and suicide issues in college situation.

METHODS: A semi-structural interview was addressed to 10 counselors from 7 college counseling centers in Beijing, among whom with (10 ± 8) years of experience on average in this field. Content analysis method was used to transcription of the interviewing data.

RESULTS: Totally 8 counselors had received ethical training more or less, and attached great importance to ethical codes. There were still some conflicts between school regulations and confidentiality rules in 7 university counseling centers. Different counselors varied greatly in decision-making on breaking confidentiality when facing college students' self-inflicted injury and suicide. Faced with conflicts between college demands and confidentiality principles, counselors could take the professional standpoint and consider more of the interests of students.

CONCLUSION: The decision-making process on self-inflicted injury and suicide confidentiality breakthrough needs to be standardized. College's attention and support to the counseling work should be strengthen and enhance ethical awareness.


Language: zh

Keywords

ethics; college counseling; breaking confidentiality; semi-structured interview

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print