SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Landy JF, Shah P. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2022; 17(1): 164-188.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Society for Judgment and Decision Making)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The act of suicide is commonly viewed as wrong in some sense, but it is not clear why this is. Based on past empirical research and philosophical theorizing, we test ten different explanations for why suicide is opposed on normative grounds. Using a within-subjects design, Study 1 showed that seven out of ten manipulations had significant effects on normative judgments of suicide: time left to live, lack of close social relationships, a history of prior immoral behavior, the manner in which the suicide is committed, painful, incurable medical issues, impulsive decision-making, and the actor's own moral-religious background. However, in all cases, the act of suicide was still considered wrong, overall. Using a between-subjects design, Study 2 tested the combined effect of the seven significant manipulations from Study 1. In combination, the seven manipulations eliminated opposition to suicide, on average. Implications for moral psychology and suicide prevention are discussed. © 2022, Society for Judgment and Decision making. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Suicide; Exploratory methods; Moral judgment; Normative judgment; Strong inference

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print