SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jones-Nosacek C. Linacre Q. 2022; 89(1): 36-46.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Catholic Medical Association)

DOI

10.1177/00243639211055970

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Conscientious objection (CO) in medicine is where a healthcare professional (HCP) firmly opposes, with an expression of reasoned disapproval, a legally available procedure or treatment that is proscribed by one's conscience. While there remains controversy regarding whether conscientious objection should be a part of medicine, even among those who support CO state that if the HCP does not provide the requested service such as abortion, physician assisted suicide, etc., there is an obligation on the part of the objecting HCP to refer to someone who will provide it. However, referral makes the referring HCP complicit in the act the referrer believes to be immoral since the referrer has a duty to know that the HCP who will accept the patient is not only able to do the procedure but is competent in its performance as well. The referrer thus facilitates the process. Since one has a moral obligation to limit complicity with immoral actions when it cannot be avoided, the alternative is to allow the patient to transfer care to another when the patient has made the autonomous decision to reject the advice of the HCP. © Catholic Medical Association 2021.


Language: en

Keywords

autonomy; bioethics; cooperation with evil; communication between healthcare professional and patient; Conscience in medicine; referral; rights of conscience; transfer of care

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print