SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Knoepffler N, O'Malley M. Ecclesiology 2021; 17(2): 238-251.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021)

DOI

10.1163/17455316-17020005

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

A 2020 decision by Germany's highest court dramatically shifted the national discussion on assisted suicide. The decision stressed the 'right to a self-determined death' which must 'be respected by state and society as an act of personal autonomy and self-determination'. Moreover, it clarified the non-criminality of assistance for suicides by third parties. The reaction of the main churches in Germany to this decision reflects ecclesiological differences. Protestant positions on assisted suicide are defined by pluralism; the Roman Catholic official position remains tied to ontologically-referenced principles of natural law that prohibit assisted suicide as intrinsically evil. Thus, ecumenical efforts on bioethics are complicated by a context where many Protestant leaders prioritize autonomy and pluralism, whereas Roman Catholic leaders stress consensus and orthodoxy. Even official church guidelines on such matters are received differently in Protestant and Roman Catholic communities. For Protestant Christians, an opinion functions primarily as guideline; for Catholic Christians, there is a goal at least of reaching principles reflecting the objective order of God's creation. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2021 | doi:10.1163/17455316-17020005


Language: en

Keywords

Assisted suicide; Autonomy; Medical ethics; Human dignity; Ecumenism; Protestant; Roman catholic

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print