Citation

DeLancey C. Philosophia (Ramat Gan) 2021; 49(5): 1953-1971.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s11406-021-00333-7

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

There are striking differences between Camus's early and late philosophical essays, but Camus often claimed that his works were part of one consistent project. This paper argues that, although Camus had a significant change in his views on the consequences of the absurd, throughout his life he also had a common concern with the relation of the absurd to morality. Showing this requires us to clarify what Camus meant by the "absurd," and identify at least three different uses of the term by Camus: lacking a purpose; lacking an explanation; and a tension between purpose and purposelessness. Clarifying the meaning of "absurd" allows one to show that Camus's late argument against suicide, often dismissed as inadequate, is valid. This also illustrates the consistency of his concerns over time. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature.

Language: en

Keywords

Suicide; Camus; Absurd; Purposefulness; Teleology