SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Aguayo FS. Eidos 2019; (31): 12-37.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Fundación Universidad del Norte)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Suicide or spinozian interfictium is at first sight a marginal category in Spinoza's thought. The vast philosophical production on who has been considered the philosopher of the "savage anomaly" or at the same time the "cheerful affects" thinker, ignores or, in the best-case scenario, obliquely addresses the notions of death and suicide. The paradox is complete because the rejection towards the thought of death contrasts with the profuse questioning of the aforesaid category in its Ethics. The goal of this article is to show that the negative expression of suicide, as pure impossibility and servitude with respect to external causes is however, less literal and clear when some central elements of its most emblematic work are incorporated in its analysis. Liberty, Need, and Substance, among others, are concepts that from suicide get tensioned showing the own limits of the geometric order insinuated by Spinoza. © 2019 Universidad del Norte. All rights reserved.


Language: es

Keywords

Sovereignty; Suicide; Liberty; Imagination; Spinoza; Voluntary servitude

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print