SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gutierrez PM, Joiner T, Hanson J, Stanley IH, Silva C, Rogers ML. Mil. Behav. Health 2019; 7(2): 177-184.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/21635781.2018.1562390

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Clinicians working in U.S. Department of Defense behavioral health settings rely on standardized suicide risk assessment measures to guide their treatment of service members. Most of the measures used were developed, normed, and validated for use with civilians. Although there is reason to believe such measures will perform similarly in civilian and military treatment settings, that assumption has rarely been confirmed empirically. The purpose of the current study was to examine data from a large assessment study to confirm the reliability and validity of 4 widely used suicide risk assessment measures for military personnel. The risk assessment measures were (a) Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale; (b) Self-Harm Behavior Questionnaire; (c) Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire--Revised; and (d) Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation. Items from the Military Suicide Research Consortium's Common Data Elements were used to examine convergent validity. Data from 1,044 military service members at risk for suicide who completed baseline assessments were used in the current analyses. Small differences were found across the measures, but overall performance was acceptable and all are considered valid and reliable to use when assessing active duty U.S. military personnel. © 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.


Language: en

Keywords

military; psychometrics; suicide measures

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print