Citation

Groarke L. Heythrop J. 2019; 60(6): 895-909.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/heyj.13014

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

I argue that 'classical liberalism' does not sanction any easy permissiveness about suicide and active euthanasia. I will use liberal arguments to argue that the distinction between active and passive euthanasia is real and that assisted suicide is, at the very least, deeply troubling when viewed from an authentic liberal perspective. The usual argument for active euthanasia is a utilitarian, not a liberal argument, as recent calls to eliminate the conscientious objection rights of doctors who refuse participation in such procedures plainly demonstrate. The paper focuses on arguments in the public sphere (such as those articulated by James Rachels). © 2018 Trustees for Roman Catholic Purposes Registered

Language: en