Citation

Calhoun L. Crit. Stud. Terror. 2018; 11(2): 357-375.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/17539153.2018.1456726

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Lethal drones or unmanned combat aerial vehicles have been used to kill thousands of persons suspected of complicity in terrorism. Despite concerns aired by legal scholars that drone strikes outside areas of active hostilities violate international law, the US government contends that targeted killing is distinct from assassination, and has persisted in the practice to the point where it has become normalised as a standard operating procedure and taken up by other nations as well. Drone strikes have been championed by Western politicians as a "light footprint" approach to war, but the institutional apparatus of remote-control killing rests on totalitarian, not democratic principles. Secretive targeting criteria and procedures are withheld from citizens under a pretext of national security, resulting in a conflation of executive with judicial authority and an inversion of the burden of proof, undermining the very framework of universal human rights said to be championed by modern Western states. Moreover, lethal drones hovering above in the sky threaten all persons on the ground with the arbitrary termination of their lives and as such represent a form of terrorism no less than the suicide bombings of jihadist groups such as Al Qaeda and ISIS. © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Language: en

Keywords

human rights; justice; democracy; Drones; dissent; presumption of innocence; totalitarianism; UCAVs