Citation

Reardon DC. SAGE Open Med. 2018; 6.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/2050312118807624

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The abortion and mental health controversy is driven by two different perspectives regarding how best to interpret accepted facts. When interpreting the data, abortion and mental health proponents are inclined to emphasize risks associated with abortion, whereas abortion and mental health minimalists emphasize pre-existing risk factors as the primary explanation for the correlations with more negative outcomes. Still, both sides agree that (a) abortion is consistently associated with elevated rates of mental illness compared to women without a history of abortion; (b) the abortion experience directly contributes to mental health problems for at least some women; (c) there are risk factors, such as pre-existing mental illness, that identify women at greatest risk of mental health problems after an abortion; and (d) it is impossible to conduct research in this field in a manner that can definitively identify the extent to which any mental illnesses following abortion can be reliably attributed to abortion in and of itself. The areas of disagreement, which are more nuanced, are addressed at length. Obstacles in the way of research and further consensus include (a) multiple pathways for abortion and mental health risks, (b) concurrent positive and negative reactions, (c) indeterminate time frames and degrees of reactions, (d) poorly defined terms, (e) multiple factors of causation, and (f) inherent preconceptions based on ideology and disproportionate exposure to different types of women. Recommendations for collaboration include (a) mixed research teams, (b) co-design of national longitudinal prospective studies accessible to any researcher, (c) better adherence to data sharing and re-analysis standards, and (d) attention to a broader list of research questions. © The Author(s) 2018.

Language: en

Keywords

human; mental health; suicide; female; Review; reproductive health; psychotherapy; post-traumatic stress disorder; bereavement; posttraumatic stress disorder; risk factor; mental disease; antidepressant agent; priority journal; mental stress; abortion; defensive behavior; pregnancy outcome; childbirth; attributable risk; postnatal depression; systematic error; complicated grief; Abortion mental health; ambiguous loss; nulligravida; post-abortion trauma; pregnancy loss; prepregnancy care; research bias