Citation

Scheffer T. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 2018; 50(3): 330-335.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018)

DOI

10.1080/07329113.2018.1557963

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This commentary urges legal pluralism research to go beyond mere constative statements and to apply a praxeological approach which asks how legal pluralism is brought into existence and what effects it produces. A methodological move from micro-analytics via object-centred analytics to some form of methodological holism is proposed in order to study how a certain object (here: assisted suicide) is being trans-sequentially compiled and transformed within the material, discursive, epistemic apparatuses (including those of a state) of plural legal orders. © 2019, © 2019 The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law.

Language: en

Keywords

social problems; Legal pluralism; object-centred analytics; trans-sequential analysis