SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Calabrò RS, Naro A, De Luca R, Russo M, Caccamo L, Manuli A, Alagna B, Aliquò A, Bramanti P. Neuroethics 2016; 9(1): 85-102.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s12152-016-9257-8

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The management of patients suffering from chronic disorders of consciousness (DOC) inevitably raises important ethical questions about the end of life decisions. Some ethical positions claim respect of human life sacredness and the use of good medical practices require allowing DOC patients to live as long as possible, since no one can arbitrarily end either his/her or others' life. On the other hand, some currents of thought claim respect of human life dignity, patients' wishes, and the right of free choice entail allowing the withdrawal of life sustaining therapy. This could happen when patients (or surrogates) believe their own life to be not worth living, or if therapy is not very beneficial, excessively burdensome, or even futile. Indeed, the decision to withdraw therapies in a DOC patient should be guided by reliable information about DOC diagnosis and prognosis and on how the patient would wish to be treated in such a condition. Taking into account such issues, it would be possible to make the decision that more adequately fits a DOC patient's best interest. This review aims to overview the range of ethical issues referring to end-of-life decisions in DOC patients, with regard to the thorny debate on the sacredness and dignity of human life. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.


Language: en

Keywords

human; suicide; Review; prognosis; medical ethics; euthanasia; patient care; priority journal; religion; terminal care; right to die; living will; treatment withdrawal; persistent vegetative state; patient attitude; Right to die; good clinical practice; consciousness disorder; human dignity; ethical decision making; patient decision making; life sustaining treatment; Vegetative state; minimally conscious state; Minimally conscious state; Artificial nutrition and hydration; Dignity of life; Sacredness of life

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print