Citation

Pitman A, Osborn DPJ, King MB. BJPsych Adv. 2015; 21(3): 175-184.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Royal College of Psychiatrists)

DOI

10.1192/apt.bp.114.012948

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article summarises internet-mediated approaches to conducting quantitative and qualitative cross-sectional mental health research, and describes aspects of research design to consider for optimising scientific rigour and validity as well as response. Rapid adoption of internet-mediated approaches risks compromising the quality of the methods used. Not only can it cause distress to participants, but methodological problems may lead to inappropriate inferences being made from research findings. In this article the advantages of using internet communication for research purposes are balanced against the disadvantages, using examples of recent internet-mediated research (IMR) studies to illustrate good practice. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: • Appreciate the range of epidemiological study designs for which IMR methods might be applied • Understand the advantages and disadvantages of using internet-mediated approaches to crosssectional studies in mental health research • Gain confidence in designing internet-mediated cross-sectional studies so as to minimise biases and potential distress to participants.

Language: en

Keywords

human; Internet; cognition; mental health; suicide; depression; sampling; screening; social network; mental disease; questionnaire; computer network; behavior; health survey; medical research; cross-sectional study; e-mail; online system; Article; internet mediated research