Citation

Tait G, Carpenter B. J. Sociol. (Melbourne, Vic.) 2015; 51(3): 553-565.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Australian Sociological Association, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1440783314550058

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Australia has a significantly higher suicide rate than England. Rather than accepting that this 'statistical fact' is a direct reflection of some positivist truth, this article begins with the premise that how suicide is counted depends upon what counts as suicide. This study involves semi-structured interviews with coroners both in Australia and England, as well as observations at inquests. Important differences between the two coronial systems include: first, quite different logics of operation; second, the burden of proof for reaching a finding of suicide is significantly higher in England; and, third, the presence of family members at English inquests results in far greater pressure being brought to bear upon coroners. These combined factors result in a reduced likelihood of English coroners reaching a finding of suicide. The conclusions are twofold. First, this research supports existing criticisms of comparative suicide statistics. Second, this research adds theoretical weight to criticisms of positivist analyses of social phenomena. © 2014, © The Author(s) 2014.

Language: en

Keywords

Suicide; mortality; governance; applied sociology; legal profession; occupations