SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Martin MS, Dorken SK, Simpson AIF, McKenzie K, Colman I. J. Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2014; 25(6): 733-747.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/14789949.2014.955811

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The Depression Hopelessness Suicide Screening Form (DHS) includes 12 'critical items', which have not been validated for the prospective prediction of self-harm. We conducted a retrospective cohort study (N = 4196) to validate the ability of the DHS critical items to prospectively predict inmates with at least one incident of self-harm during the first six months of imprisonment. While the critical items were highly sensitive (89.5%) at predicting incidents of self-harm, 51.3% of the inmates endorsed at least one item. Five items reflecting more recent and specific risk factors reduced the referral rate to 17.7%, while maintaining high sensitivity (84.2%). While the DHS has high sensitivity to predict inmates at risk of self-harm, treating all items as equally critical results in excessive numbers of false positives that likely exceed the capacity of prison resources for professional assessment and intervention. Referral rules based on recency and specificity of risk factors are proposed. © 2014 Taylor & Francis.


Language: en

Keywords

human; suicide; female; male; deliberate self-harm; mass screening; retrospective study; automutilation; prisoner; cohort analysis; sensitivity analysis; Article; predictive validity; named inventories, questionnaires and rating scales; Depression Hopelessness Suicide screening form; prisons

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print