Citation

Puggioni R. Citizenship Stud. 2014; 18(5): 562-577.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/13621025.2014.923707

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This work reflects on the character of the modalities that non-status migrants are deploying in the context of current politics of the camp, with special attention to the Italian context. It will suggest that once the possibilities of dissent through the voice (the political tool par excellence in a liberal democracy, and one associated primarily with rationality and the capacity for reason) are foreclosed, migrants tend to resort to another powerful tool: their own body. Detainees have made their bodies speak by resorting to practices of self-mutilation, hunger strike, suicide attempts, and lips and eyes sewing. Detainees' violent acts of dissent are not dissimilar from the violent modalities used, a few centuries earlier, by some enslaved people who chose liberty through death. The aim is not so much to make comparison between the two figures, but to emphasise the way in which, under conditions of extreme control, subjugation or unfreedom, acts of dissent and resistance - and thus acts of politics, as articulated in Rancière's concept of dissensus - are not necessarily enacted through democratic practices but, on the contrary, through whatever modalities are available to them, including violent (self-harm) modalities. © 2014 © 2014 Taylor & Francis.

Language: en

Keywords

violence; migration; Italy; politics; citizenship; acts of citizenship; bodily resistance; camps; dissensus; slavery