SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Paulozzi LJ, Ibrahimova A, Rudd RA, Goldberger BA, Thogmartin JR, Shelton K. Acad. Forensic Pathol. 2012; 2(2): 190-197.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, National Association of Medical Examiners)

DOI

10.23907/2012.027

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Death certificates are a source of information on deaths caused by specific drugs. However, the completeness of such information has been questioned. This study compared counts in the Florida Medical Examiner Commission's drug related death reporting system (ME) with those from death certificates (DC) for overdose deaths involving selected drugs during 2005-2008 to assess the completeness of death certificate information. DC data indicated 2,401 deaths with benzodiazepines as a cause, 2,182 for cocaine, 2,055 for methadone, and 416 for heroin. The ratios of ME deaths to DC deaths were 1.19 (95% CI 1.13-1.26) for benzodiazepines, 1.38 (95% CI 1.31-1.46) for cocaine, 1.37 (95% CI 1.29-1.44) for methadone, and 0.96 (95% CI 0.83-1.09) for heroin. For each drug, ratios were similar for unintentional (accidental), suicide, and undetermined intent deaths. Ratios varied across the 24 ME districts, but few districts reported significantly fewer deaths in the ME system than in the DC system.

RESULTS suggest that surveillance based on death certificate data underestimates specific drug caused deaths as counted by medical examiners in a state with multiple, independent medical examiners. Death certificate data might therefore underestimate drug overdose mortality nationwide. © 2012 Academic Forensic Pathology international.


Language: en

Keywords

Epidemiology; Overdose; Forensic pathology; Coroners and medical examiners

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print