Citation

Oliveira ATB. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 2024; 95(6): 321-326.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Aerospace Medical Association)

DOI

10.3357/AMHP.6374.2024

PMID

38790131

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: On-board medical emergencies are increasing. Different geographies have different legislation and requirements for medical emergency kits and first aid kits. A comprehensive review to compare the contents of both kits was conducted, including the International Air Transport Association, European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and Federal Aviation Administration, as well as some from other geographical areas of the globe to cover continents and regions with the highest air traffic, such as Brazil, Kenya, Australia, and Taiwan.

METHODS: On June 10, 2023, a search was conducted using standardized medical terms (medical subject headings) within the PubMed(®) database. The relevant terms identified were "Aircraft" and "Medical Emergencies"; articles published within the last 10 yr were filtered. Subsequently, even articles published before 2013 were consulted if cited by the initial ones. The main regulatory entities' documentation was found using the Google search engine and consulted.

CONCLUSIONS: It is impossible to be prepared for every emergency on board. Still, as doctors, we have a moral and ethical obligation to try to improve the outcomes of those emergencies. Getting a standardized report of every on-board emergency is crucial. That would make optimizing the items to include in the emergency and first aid kits easier. There are many similarities among the compared entities, but essential differences have been found. There is room for improvement, especially for pediatric travelers.Oliveira ATB. Worldwide regulation of the medical emergency kit and first aid kit. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(6):321-326.

Language: en

Keywords

*First Aid; Aerospace Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence; Aircraft; Emergencies; Emergency Medical Services/legislation & jurisprudence; Humans