Citation

Smiley-McDonald HM, Keyes KA, Wire S, Greenwell K, Santos NA, Ropero-Miller JD. Forensic Sci. Int. Synergy 2024; 8: e100467.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100467

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In the United States, medical examiners and coroners (MECs) fill critical roles within our public health and public safety systems. These professionals are primarily charged with determining the cause and manner of death as they investigate deaths and respond to associated scenes and mass fatalities and can also help identify trends in public health crises through medicolegal death investigations. Despite their instrumental role, they are organized in disparate systems with varying governing structures, functions, staffing, caseload, budget, and access to resources. This paper examines data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroners to evaluate MEC operations in the United States. The findings show that MEC offices' organizational and operational governance structures greatly influence resources, workloads, and access to information and services. Standalone MEC offices were generally better resourced than those affiliated with law enforcement, public health, forensic science, district attorneys, or other agencies.1

Language: en

Keywords

Coroner; Forensic medicine; Forensic science; Governing agency; Medical examiner; Medicolegal death investigation; Resources