Citation

Morgan N. Technol. Cult. 2024; 65(2): 473-495.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Johns Hopkins University Press)

DOI

10.1353/tech.2024.a926312

PMID

38766958

Abstract

This article explores why white supremacists regard self-directed mobility by people of color as threatening by examining a controversy that unfolded in a mining town called Springs during the apartheid era in South Africa. Drawing on archives, oral histories, and testimonies, it shows how white residents of Selcourt and Selection Park, along with their allies in the town council, prevented Black workers from walking and cycling through the suburbs. Infrastructure and social disciplinary institutions proved effective in forcing Black workers to largely comply. It argues that the white supremacist disciplinary imperative against the workers arose directly from the characteristics of their mode of mobility. In their open embodiment, free from the confines of mechanized transport, and slow speeds, the workers engaged in a sustained refusal of spatial segregation. The article highlights how racial difference as an analytical category sheds light on mobility control within regimes of white supremacy.

Language: en

Keywords

*Walking/history; Apartheid/history; Bicycling/history; Black People/history; History, 20th Century; Humans; Race Relations/history; Racism/history; South Africa