CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Guidi S, Kosovicheva A, Wolfe B. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 2024; 9(1): e32. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2024, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
38767722 |
|
Abstract |
Drivers must respond promptly to a wide range of possible road hazards, from trucks veering into their lane to pedestrians stepping onto the road. While drivers' vision is tested at the point of licensure, visual function can degrade, and drivers may not notice how these changes impact their ability to notice and respond to events in the world in a timely fashion. To safely examine the potential consequences of visual degradation on hazard detection, we performed two experiments examining the impact of simulated optical blur on participants' viewing duration thresholds in a hazard detection task, as a proxy for eyes-on-road duration behind the wheel. Examining this question with older and younger participants, across two experiments, we found an overall increase in viewing duration thresholds under blurred conditions, such that younger and older adults were similarly impacted by blur. Critically, in both groups, we found that the increment in thresholds produced by blur was larger for non-vehicular road hazards (pedestrians, cyclists and animals) compared to vehicular road hazards (cars, trucks and buses). This work suggests that blur poses a particular problem for drivers detecting non-vehicular road users, a population considerably more vulnerable in a collision than vehicular road users. These results also highlight the importance of taking into account the type of hazard when considering the impacts of blur on road hazard detection. Language: en |
|
Keywords |
*Automobile Driving; Accidents, Traffic; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bicycling/physiology; Blur; Driving; Female; Hazard detection; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Motor Vehicles; Scene perception; Visual Perception/physiology; Young Adult |