Citation

Chen Q, Lu Z, Liu B, Xiao Q, Zhu Y, Chan KL. BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1): e259.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group - BMC)

DOI

10.1186/s40359-024-01766-x

PMID

38725028

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although abundant evidence has confirmed cyberbullying as a global online risk, little is known about the coping strategies employed by victims and those who experiencing bullying. A validated scale for coping with cyberbullying could inform evidence-based social services and enable comparative studies of this phenomenon among victims from different backgrounds. This study aims to validate the Coping Strategies for Victims of Cyberbullying (CSVC) scale among Chinese adolescents and to compare its effectiveness between victims and bully-victims (individuals with dual roles).

METHODS: A 25-item CSVC scale was translated and adapted for cultural relevance in the Chinese context. A sample of 1,716 adolescents, aged 13-18 years, from two middle schools and one high school in China, was recruited. Both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted.

RESULTS: The EFA revealed that the Chinese version of the CSVC scale had satisfactory validity. The CFA demonstrated a good fit for the eight-factor model in assessing different coping strategies for cyberbullying. Differences in the selection of coping strategies were observed between the general adolescent population and sexual and gender minorities.

CONCLUSIONS: Future intervention studies may use this validated scale to educate adolescents, both those affected by cyberbullying and those who are not, to learn a broader range of coping strategies and to choose more effective ones.

Language: en

Keywords

*Adaptation, Psychological; *Crime Victims/psychology; *Cyberbullying/psychology; Adolescent; Bullying/psychology; China; Chinese adolescents; Coping Skills; Cyberbullying coping; Cyberbullying questionnaire; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Female; Humans; Male; Psychometrics/instrumentation; Reproducibility of Results; Sexual and gender minorities; Surveys and Questionnaires/standards; Validation