Citation

Ke JJ, Hong GL. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi 2024; 42(4): 312-315.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Tianjin shi lao dong wei sheng yan jiu suo)

DOI

10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230329-00107

PMID

38678000

Abstract

Acute poisoning represents a prevalent critical illness jeopardizing patient survival. Early, precise assessment of the condition and subsequent appropriate therapeutic intervention are pivotal in enhancing treatment success rates. Currently, a standardized approach to evaluating the severity of acute poisoning is lacking. Various scoring systems, including Poisoning Severity Score (PSS) , Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) , and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) , offer valuable insights into acute poisoning assessment. Nevertheless, the distinct attributes of each scoring system constrain their broad clinical utility. Confronted with the intricate clinical demands of acute poisoning, the adoption of staged and dynamic assessment strategies is imperative to ascertain the condition of acute poisoning patients with greater accuracy.

Language: zh

Keywords

*Poisoning/diagnosis/therapy; Acute Disease; Acute poisoning; APACHE; Assessment; Early Warning Score; Emergency medicine; Humans; Organicphosphorus pesticides; Paraquat; Poisoning; Severity of Illness Index