Citation

Korzi MJ. Stud. Am. Polit. Devel. 2024; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Cambridge University Press)

DOI

10.1017/S0898588X2300007X

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article examines how public opinion--notably political activism and protest, as well as threats of violence, and violence itself--shaped the eventual resolution of the 1876 election. While not discounting the bargaining or machinations of party elites in forging an ultimate compromise, the standard explanation in the scholarly literature, the emphasis here adds important texture and nuance to the conversation, and strongly suggests that public opinion (broadly construed) played a significant, if not exclusive, role in pressuring party leaders to compromise on the eventual Electoral Commission Act that resolved the crisis. In particular, a series of January 1877 demonstrations held across several key states, coupled with the threat of "menace" at the heart of the Southern rifle clubs that were prominent in the campaign and its aftermath, provided strong incentives to partisan leaders and especially members of Congress to seek compromise to resolve the electoral crisis. The article also addresses the contested nature of mass meetings and protests in this era--and in general--and how partisans seek to define terms and behaviors to suit their political positions.

© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Language: en