Citation

Babcock JC, Kini S, Godfrey DA, Rodriguez L. Psychosoc. Interv. 2024; 33(1): 43-54.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Colegio Oficial de la Psicología de Madrid)

DOI

10.5093/pi2024a2

PMID

38298213

PMCID

PMC10826976

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The current study reexamines data from Babcock et al. (2011) proximal change experiment to discern the differential utility of two communication skills-based interventions for proactive and reactive partner violence offenders.

METHOD: Partner violent men were randomly assigned to the Editing Out the Negative skill, the Accepting Influence skill, or to a placebo/timeout and reengaged in a conflict discussion with their partners. Proactivity was tested as a moderator of immediate intervention outcomes. The ability to learn the communication skills, changes in self-reported affect, observed aggression, and psychophysiological responding were examined as a function of proactivity of violence.

RESULTS: Highly proactive men had some difficulty learning the Accepting Influence skill and they responded poorly to this intervention. They responded positively to the Editing Out the Negative technique, with less aggression, more positive affect, and lower heart rates. Low proactive (i.e., reactive) men tended to feel less aggressive, more positive, and less physiologically aroused after completing the Accepting Influence technique.

CONCLUSIONS: This study lends support for tailoring batterer interventions specific to perpetrator characteristics.

Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Male; Emotions; Violence; Intimate partner violence; *Aggression; *Criminals; Battering intervention; Couples’ interactions; Observational coding; Treatment matching