SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Huber S, Lindemann P, Schröter B. Transp. Res. Proc. 2023; 72: 367-374.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Elsevier Publications)

DOI

10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.416

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Little is known about the influence of accident risk and perceived safety on bicycle route choice. Do accident hot spots or points of 'perceived insecure' influence actual route choice of cyclists? To answer that question a GPS data set (∼4,000 trips from ∼170 study participants) and further data (infrastructure, operation, exposure, accidents reports, and survey data recording critical incidents) is used. The results reveal that a high accident risk along the route shows a significant negative but slight influence on route choice. In contrast, perceived safety does not significantly influence route choice. Other factors (e.g. existence or narrow width of cycling infrastructure, higher traffic volumes of bicycle traffic, signal controlled intersections) show significant influence and may represent perceived safety better than the used survey data.


Language: en

Keywords

accident risk; bicycle route choice; GPS route data; multinomial logit; perceived safety

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print