Citation

Monté CPJA, Arends JBAM, Lazeron RHC, Tan IY, Boon PAJM. Epilepsy Behav. 2023; 140: e108995.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108995

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the ECOMRAID trial (Epileptic seizure related Complication RAte in residential population of persons with epilepsy and Intellectual Disability) was to study seizure-related complications (status epilepticus, respiratory complications, or other severe complications) in people with epilepsy and intellectual disability living in a residential setting. The results of the present study are a prerequisite for performing a prospective study into the effectiveness of nocturnal surveillance patients with high risk for Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted in three general residential care institutions and one residential specialized epilepsy clinic. In this 5-year cohort, we collected the following data: age (at inclusion and in case of death), sex, type of residential care, different types of complications, rescue/emergency medication administration, transfers to another department (internal midcare / monitoring unit or general hospital) and a self-designed SUDEP risk score. Our primary research questions were to assess the number of patients who experienced seizure-related complications and their individual complication rates. The secondary research questions were to document the relationship of these complications with the SUDEP risk score, with the type of residential living, and with the frequency of interventions by caregivers.

RESULTS: We included 370 patients (1790 patient-years) and in 135 of them, we found 717 seizure-related complications. The following complication rates were found: all complications: at 36%, status epilepticus: at 13%, respiratory complications: at 5%, and other complications at 26%. In residential care institutions, we found fewer patients with complications compared to the specialized epilepsy clinic (all complications 24% vs 42%, OR 0.44, p < 0.01; status epilepticus 5% vs 17%, OR 0.27, p < 0.01; other: complications 19% vs 30%, OR 0.56, p < 0.05). In residential care institutions, we found more "other complications" than in the specialized epilepsy clinic (89% vs 71%, OR 3.13, p < 0.0001). The annual frequency of all complications together was higher in residential care institutions (range 0 to 21 vs 0 to 10, p < 0.05). Rescue medication was given to 75% of the patients, but more often in the specialized epilepsy clinic (median 2.6 vs 0.5 times/patient/year, p < 0.001). In the specialized epilepsy clinic, more patients were transferred to a midcare / monitoring unit or general hospital (56% vs 9%, OR 13.44, p < 0.0001) with higher yearly frequencies (median 0.2 vs 0.0, p < 0.001). There were no reported cases of SUDEP. The median SUDEP risk score was higher in the specialized epilepsy clinic (5 vs 4, p < 0.05) and was weakly correlated with the status epilepticus (ρ = 0.20, p < 0.001) and (total) complication rate (ρ = 0.18, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: We found seizure-related complications in more than one-third of the patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability living in a residential setting over a period of 5 years. The data also quantify seizure-related complications in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability.

Language: en

Keywords

Epilepsy; Intellectual disability; Residential care; Seizure-related complication