Citation

Smith LKM, Wolfe SE. People Nat. (Hoboken) 2023; 5(4): 1336-1352.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/pan3.10505

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

All nature relies on water, yet climate change threatens water availability to the highest degree--from too much (e.g. extreme weather; flooding) to too little (e.g. droughts; wildfires). These water shifts threaten all life on earth. Societies' safe and reliable water accessibility faces growing uncertainty from climate change; however, water crisis communication may inadvertently remind audiences of their mortality. According to terror management theory, these mortality reminders can hinder pro-environmental efforts in humans and even increase intergroup biases--a significant challenge for developing environmental solutions. While climate change has been examined as a mortality reminder, water remains untested. We presented participants with either a mortality-laden message, an aversive but not-life-threatening message, or one of three threatening water-related messages--experiencing drowning, dehydration or contaminated water consumption--to determine if the water-related messages function similarly to the mortality message. Some (e.g. drowning; contaminated water), but not all (e.g. dehydration), water messages increased death-thought accessibility, which could lead to paradoxical environmental behaviours, depending on the audience. Our research findings should inform policymakers, non-profit organizations and other water correspondents' communication strategies. As some threatening water messages elicit similar responses to known mortality reminders, the way water crises are framed is important for water-related decision-making and ensuring equitable, successful pro-environmental outcomes.

Language: en

Keywords

climate change; communication; decision-making; mortality salience; pro-environmental outcomes; terror management theory; water crises