SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Yang Y, Ma B, Cao Y. China Saf. Sci. J. 2022; 32(12): 38-45.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, China Occupational Safety and Health Association, Publisher Gai Xue bao)

DOI

10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.12.2739

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Taking the investigation reports of foreign unsafe events in ATM in the past 20 years as data samples, the risk factors leading to human errors of controllers were studied. Based on the method of cognitive error backtracking analysis (TRACEr), the types and root causes of controller errors were divided into four cognitive levels: perception, memory, planning decision and response execution. The data mining method based on RST and the reverse reasoning method of BN were used to calculate the error risk representation value of each cognitive field. The results show that vigilance failure, information processing fault, environmental interference and unclear information transmission were the high⁃risk factors of unsafe events. The root causes of visual perception errors such as boundary vision limitation, visual recognition error, expectation tendency and unglobalized attention are the main influencing factors in the ground unsafe events. The root causes of memory impairment, insufficient learning, risk identification failure, and negative effects, account for the main influence in air insecurity incidents. The visual perception error and information transmission error obtained by RST are the main human error types. In the conclusion of BN analysis, judgment error is the most important human error next to visual perception error. © 2022 China Safety Science Journal. All rights reserved.


Language: zh

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print