Citation

Lan Q, Liu S, Ren C, Tan M. China Saf. Sci. J. 2020; 30(10): 1-11.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, China Occupational Safety and Health Association, Publisher Gai Xue bao)

DOI

10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.10.001

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In order to explore main contradiction and future development directions of production safety governance, development trend from passive safety to active safety was systematically discussed and theories of safety governance were further enriched and improved. Firstly, through literature analysis and practice research methods, economy, technology, management, and culture were extracted as basic, supporting, ensuring and leading influencing factors of safety governance. Secondly, a system dynamics model was established and influencing mechanism of these factors was revealed. Then, according to contradiction and development theory based on historical materialism and materialist dialectics, it was put forward that the major contradiction in China's future-oriented safety governance lied in that between safety and culture. Finally, development framework of safety governance was designed based on contradiction analysis. The results show that future production safety governance should focus on aspects of economy, technology, management and culture, among which culture will be core logic to achieve transformation of passive safety to active safety. © 2020 China Safety Science Journal. All rights reserved.

Language: zh