SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Zuo Z, Pan X, Huang Y, Wang X, Zhang L. China Saf. Sci. J. 2020; 30(1): 53-60.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, China Occupational Safety and Health Association, Publisher Gai Xue bao)

DOI

10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.01.009

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In order to accurately monitor operation safety of ICCP, internal relations and differences of basic principles for safety monitoring between ICCP and super high-rise buildings were discussed. With twenty safety monitoring projects for super high-rise buildings as examples, including Burj Khalifa, Shanghai Center and Taipei 101, statistical analysis was made for key monitoring items and indicators during construction and operation periods, and these items were graded according to importance. Then, based on statistical analysis results and a large number of ICCP practices, ICCP key monitoring items and warning indicators were presented, which was verified by field test of a high-rise building with three asymmetric connected towers, 368 m high at maximum. The results show that ICCP monitoring indicators are in a reasonable range, and levelness of platform frame is finally controlled within 20 mm. And proposed ICCP warning indicators can help improve security capability and informationization of super high-rise building construction. © 2019 China Safety Science Journal


Language: zh

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print